Comparative Analysis of Organizational Performance Across Institutional Sectors Based on Performance Technology Implementation
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Abstract
This study presents a comparative analysis of the implementation of performance technology across various sectors, driven by the increasing adoption of digital technology but not yet accompanied by equitable performance outcomes. This study aims to examine differences in organizational performance across sectors and identify best practices that contribute to improved performance. The method used is a comparative quantitative approach with a cross-sectional design, involving samples from the education, industry, government, and public services sectors through a stratified random sampling technique. Data collection was conducted using a Likert-scale questionnaire that has been tested for validity and reliability, while data analysis used ANOVA and Tukey's post hoc test to identify significant differences between groups. The results show significant differences in performance across sectors, with the industry sector as the most superior, followed by public services, education, and government. These findings confirm that the success of performance technology implementation is influenced by organizational readiness, human resource competency, and the integration of technology systems with work processes. The conclusions of this study emphasize the importance of a contextual approach in the implementation of performance technology and the need for capacity building and adaptive strategies in each sector. Further research is recommended to examine moderating factors in more depth with a longitudinal design to gain a more comprehensive understanding.
Downloads
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
References
G. Ertug, J. Brennecke, dan S. Tasselli, “Theorizing about the Implications of Multiplexity: An Integrative Typology,” Acad. Manag. Ann., vol. 17, no. 2, hal. 626–654, Jul 2023, doi: 10.5465/annals.2021.0193.
D. B. Minbaeva, “Building credible human capital analytics for organizational competitive advantage,” Hum. Resour. Manage., vol. 57, no. 3, hal. 701–713, Mei 2018, doi: 10.1002/hrm.21848.
S. Kraus, S. Durst, J. J. Ferreira, P. Veiga, N. Kailer, dan A. Weinmann, “Digital transformation in business and management research: An overview of the current status quo,” Int. J. Inf. Manage., vol. 63, hal. 102466, Apr 2022, doi: 10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2021.102466.
R. Chugh, D. Turnbull, M. A. Cowling, R. Vanderburg, dan M. A. Vanderburg, “Implementing educational technology in Higher Education Institutions: A review of technologies, stakeholder perceptions, frameworks and metrics,” Educ. Inf. Technol., vol. 28, no. 12, hal. 16403–16429, Des 2023, doi: 10.1007/s10639-023-11846-x.
M. Cosa dan R. Torelli, “Digital Transformation and Flexible Performance Management: A Systematic Literature Review of the Evolution of Performance Measurement Systems,” Glob. J. Flex. Syst. Manag., vol. 25, no. 3, hal. 445–466, Sep 2024, doi: 10.1007/s40171-024-00409-9.
N. Saputra, R. E. Putera, A. Zetra, Azwar, T. R. Valentina, dan R. A. Mulia, “Capacity building for organizational performance: a systematic review, conceptual framework, and future research directions,” Cogent Bus. Manag., vol. 11, no. 1, hal. 2434966, Des 2024, doi: 10.1080/23311975.2024.2434966.
R. Ramadania, Y. Hartijasti, B. B. Purmono, D. M. N. Haris, dan M. Z. Afifi, “A Systematic Review on Digital Transformation and Organizational Performance in Higher Education,” Int. J. Sustain. Dev. Plan., vol. 19, no. 4, hal. 1239–1252, Apr 2024, doi: 10.18280/ijsdp.190402.
B. Deacon, M. Laufer, dan L. O. Schäfer, “Infusing educational technologies in the heart of the university—A systematic literature review from an organisational perspective,” Br. J. Educ. Technol., vol. 54, no. 2, hal. 441–466, Mar 2023, doi: 10.1111/bjet.13277.
F. Escobar, W. H. C. Almeida, dan J. Varajão, “Digital transformation success in the public sector: A systematic literature review of cases, processes, and success factors,” Inf. Polity, vol. 28, no. 1, hal. 61–81, Feb 2023, doi: 10.3233/IP-211518.
J. Marienfeldt, L. M. Wehmeier, dan S. Kuhlmann, “Top-down or bottom-up digital transformation? A comparison of institutional changes and outcomes,” Public Money Manag., vol. 45, no. 5, hal. 456–465, Jul 2025, doi: 10.1080/09540962.2024.2365351.
R. Enstroem, P. Singh Kang, dan B. Bhawna, “The harmonized information-technology and organizational performance model (HI-TOP),” Int. J. Organ. Anal., vol. 33, no. 5, hal. 1277–1292, Jun 2025, doi: 10.1108/IJOA-03-2024-4403.
K. Rosalina dan R. Jusoh, “Levers of Control, Counterproductive Work Behavior, and Work Performance: Evidence From Indonesian Higher Education Institutions,” Sage Open, vol. 14, no. 3, Jul 2024, doi: 10.1177/21582440241278455.
E. Marlina dan N. F. Lawita, “Information technology and higher education institutions (HEI) performance: the mediating role of organizational capability,” J. Account. Invest., vol. 25, no. 1, hal. 137–151, Feb 2024, doi: 10.18196/jai.v25i1.20591.
B. Perdomo dan O. A. Morales, “Design and validation of a questionnaire to assess digital skills for research,” J. E-Learning Knowl. Soc., vol. 20, no. 3, hal. 83–89, 2024, doi: 10.20368/1971-8829/1136008.
Z. Karimian dan F. Chahartangi, “Development and validation of a questionnaire to measure educational agility: a psychometric assessment using exploratory factor analysis,” BMC Med. Educ., vol. 24, no. 1, hal. 1284, Nov 2024, doi: 10.1186/s12909-024-06307-z.
M. N. Meyer et al., “Ethical principles for online research: Guidance for survey-based studies involving human participants,” J. Empir. Res. Hum. Res. Ethics, vol. 19, no. 2, hal. 168–182, 2024, doi: 10.1177/15562646231219858.
K. Anglin, “Addressing Threats to Validity in Supervised Machine Learning: A Framework and Best Practices for Education Researchers,” AERA Open, vol. 10, Jan 2024, doi: 10.1177/23328584241303495.
K. Roth dan K. Farahmand, “A Socio-Technical Study of Industry 4.0 and SMEs: Recent Insights from the Upper Midwest,” Sustainability, vol. 15, no. 16, hal. 12559, Agu 2023, doi: 10.3390/su151612559.
T. Sergei et al., “Digital transformation enablers in high-tech and low-tech companies: A comparative analysis,” Aust. J. Manag., vol. 48, no. 4, hal. 801–843, Nov 2023, doi: 10.1177/03128962231157102.
K. L. Lee, S. Y. Wong, H. M. Alzoubi, B. Al Kurdi, M. T. Alshurideh, dan M. El Khatib, “Adopting smart supply chain and smart technologies to improve operational performance in manufacturing industry,” Int. J. Eng. Bus. Manag., vol. 15, Feb 2023, doi: 10.1177/18479790231200614.
B. Taganoviq et al., “Psychometric assessment of organizational readiness scale for digital innovations and antecedents of organizational readiness,” Hum. Syst. Manag., vol. 43, no. 5, hal. 1–18, Mei 2023, doi: 10.3233/HSM-220202.
A. Taher, “Stakeholders’ opinions support the people-process-technology framework for implementing digital transformation in higher education,” Technol. Pedagog. Educ., vol. 32, no. 5, hal. 555–567, Okt 2023, doi: 10.1080/1475939X.2023.2248134.
M. Govers dan P. van Amelsvoort, “A theoretical essay on socio-technical systems design thinking in the era of digital transformation,” Grup. Interaktion. Organ. Zeitschrift fur Angew. Organ., vol. 54, no. 1, hal. 27–40, 2023, doi: 10.1007/s11612-023-00675-8.
V. Barba-Sánchez, A. Meseguer-Martínez, R. Gouveia-Rodrigues, dan M. L. Raposo, “Effects of digital transformation on firm performance: The role of IT capabilities and digital orientation,” Heliyon, vol. 10, no. 6, hal. e27725, Mar 2024, doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e27725.